Tweet
Round 1, Pick 21 - Calvin Pryor, FS, Louisville
Unless C.J. Mosely is dangling above Ted Thompson's head here at 21 overall, the Packers will draft their biggest need over best talent available. Calvin Pryor is probably the most NFL ready safety in this draft next to HaHa Clinton-Dix and Jimmie Ward. With the way Ted Thompson handled the defensive line in free agency, the Packers can focus on drafting defensive backs and linebackers to rebuild the defense, and it all starts here in Round 1.
Round 2, Pick 53 - Trent Murphy, DE/OLB, Stanford
Packers are really high on Trent Murphy and that's why he's staying here in this mock draft. His name has come up the most when Ted Thompson has talked about draft prospects. The Packers have longed for a outside linebacker to lineup opposite of Clay Matthews. Nick Perry has yet to stay healthy enough to tell if he is the guy or not. Newly signed Packer Julius Peppers is likely to play split time at OLB and DE this year. Adding depth to linebacker is a must this draft as it became the most injured position on the team last year.
Round 3, Pick 85 - Jared Abbrederis, WR, Wisconsin
In case you missed the news, James Jones was signed to a three year contract with the Oakland Raiders. As it stands, the Packers have Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, Jarrett Boykin, and Myles White with others on the practice squad. Just two years ago the Packers had Greg Jennings, Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, James Jones, and Donald Driver. They need to add a wide receiver early in the draft and this is a great spot for it with the likelihood of having two picks in the second round. Jard Abbrederis is such a Ted Thompson kind of guy. Not only could Jared be a deep threat option for Aaron Rodgers, but he could also serve as a solid option as a kick returner.
Round 3, Compensatory Pick (Greg Jennings) - C.J. Fiedorowicz, TE, Iowa
Look, I know there are a lot of people out there that really like Andrew Quarless. I am not one of them. I just don't feel comfortable going into the season with Quarless, Ryan Taylor, Brandon Bostick and Jake Stoneburner as our only tight end options. We don't need to reach for a tight end in the first round for a guy like Ebron or Amaro, but we need an upgrade from what we have. Fiedorowicz is a perfect tight end for the Packers offense. He can block and has great hands with decent burst to get yards after contact.
Round 4, Pick ??? - Max Bullough, ILB, Michigan State
As I said above, the Packers need serious help at linebacker, but especially at inside linebacker. The aging AJ Hawk and the incredibly inconsistent Brad Jones are at the top of the depth chart. Beneath them is Jamari Lattimore who actually is a promising young talent and Sam Barrington who just needs to keep developing. In a perfect world the Packers would cut ties with Hawk to free up cap space and just hit the reset button on the entire interior linebacker squad. max Bullough is the guy that was suspended from football activities at Michigan State for an off the field issue. Bullough had an incredible combine and probably out-shined the rest of the inside linebackers. But, because of the off the field issue, he will likely drop in the draft. It's a good thing Green Bay is an organization that can help off the field issues players have. Max is highly regarded by his coaches. He's a defensive leader.
Round 5, Pick ??? - Seantrel Henderson, OT, Miami
With the loss of EDS to the Buccaneers and the apparent departure of Marshall Newhouse, the Packers will need to address the offensive line in the draft. Injuries were an issue last year as the team lost Bryan Bulaga in training camp with a torn ACL. Without a set in stone center, the Packers may have to shuffle the line around again. If they want a quick fix, the Packers will try either JC Tretter or Don Barclay at center. To cover the blow of the losses and a possible changing of the guard (pun intended) on the line, drafting an offensive lineman here is not a bad idea. Seantrel Henderson is a massive human being. He'd be a instant improvement over Newhouse and would provide as an excellent backup tackle to Bulaga and Bakhtiari.
Round 6, Pick ??? - Logan Thomas, QB, Virginia Tech
The Packers need to develop a dependable back up QB. Last year that became painfully evident. Matt Flynn was able to cushion the blow of losing Aaron Rodgers once he was eventually signed. Logan Thomas is a great pick here. Receiving comparisons like "Cam 2.0" is very intriguing to me. I've seen a few mocks that have Green Bay taking Tajh Boyd as early as the fourth round. No. That can't happen and won't happen. Boyd is not good at quarterback. That was evident at the NFL Combine when scouts and league executives said they wouldn't even waste a draft pick on him. The Packers have more needs to fill in the earlier rounds than to take a quarterback that *likely* won't see a lot of playing time.
Round 6, Compensatory Pick (Erik Walden) - Avery Williamson, ILB, Kentucky
Williamson is one of those Ted Thompson guys. Under the radar guy who fits exactly into the defensive scheme. As I stated above, middle linebacker is a very shallow area for the Packers and they need depth. Williamson is very quick. He's a great tackler. He'll defend in short coverage, he'll rack up pass defends, he'll rap up a ball carrier. He's a perfect weight and height for the position, standing in at 6-1, 249 pounds. At the NFL Combine, he ran a 4.66 40 yard dash and was a top performer in the 20 yard shuttle.
Round 7, Pick ??? - C.J. Barnett, SS, Ohio State
The Packers take a second safety here. The secondary was absolutely destroyed last season due to injury and just lack of performance. The Packers have had a void in the secondary since the team lost Nick Collins. There are some bright spots. The emergence of Casey Hayward and Micah Hyde has been refreshing. Also, Sam Shields coming back provides some stability. Tramon Williams had a very productive year last season. C.J. Barnett would come from an Ohio State team that has produced defensive backs such as Malcolm Jenkins, Nate Clements, Antoine Winfield, Chris Gamble, Donte Whitner and Kurt Coleman. Barnett was a bright spot on the OSU defense that was near the bottom of the Big Ten ranks.
Until next time, Beers, Brats, and Championships.
-Andrew Vrchota
Follow us on Twitter (@WISportsBlog)
for up to date news on the Packers, Brewers, Badgers, Bucks, and Golden
Eagles. We feature live in-game commentary, breaking news, rumors,
previews, and post game discussion. Follow the entire writing team on
Twitter: @AndrewVrchota, @jheldred, @JoeP_Norton, @olewr7, @Stevie2Westside, and @10iskristin
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Wisconsin Badger 2014 Tournament Preview
Tweet
Let’s start out with some comparisons. The 2006-2007 team
was by most accounts Bo Ryan’s most successful regular season team. They climbed
all the way to a number one ranking in the AP poll, a first in program history.
The Badgers also took advantage of the NCAA’s summer exhibition in a foreign
country rule and began the year with a trip to Italy. Flash forward to 2014.
Wisconsin started the season with a trip to Canada going 4-1 against
top college programs north of the border and climbed to a top 5 ranking. But the similarities don’t stop
there.
Nigel Hayes and Bronson Koenig were wildcards at the beginning of the season. With one senior playing regular minutes, how quickly the two freshman could adjust to big time college basketball would go a long way toward determining the team's success. Consider Hayes and Koenig as having passed that test.
Collectively the Badgers have a tendency to lapse into lackadaisical defense. Their miscommunication was on full display in the January 22 loss at Minnesota. Sam Dekker chases non-shooting threat Oto Osenieks out toward the three point line as he attempts to screen Ben Brust guarding Austin Hollins. Brust anticipates Dekker to switch and take Hollins as he drives to the hoop. But Dekker keeps trailing Osenieks(again – a career 23% three point shooter) and Brust turns Hollins loose. The result is painful.
While they cannot be expected to suddenly turn into a defensive juggernaut, Wisconsin will need to shore up the communication and find a way to get a few big stops in order to keep dancing into March.
I still think this Badger team has shades of Michigan from last year. Both teams were undefeated in non-conference play and struggled somewhat in the rugged and physical Big Ten. Once Michigan entered the tournament, their offensive prowess was on full display and they were 20 minutes of a national title.
Is this the year Bo Ryan silences the doubters with a Final Four run? |
Record
|
Highest Rank
|
Points Scored
|
Points Allowed
|
KenPom Off. Effenciency
|
KenPom Def. Efficiency
|
KenPom Tempo
|
NCAA seed
|
|
2014
|
26-7
|
3
|
73.5
|
64.6
|
119.5
|
98.7
|
64.4
|
#2
|
2007
|
30-6
|
1
|
70.2
|
57.9
|
112.5
|
89.8
|
64.4
|
#2
|
Don't forget about Brian Butch and Alando Tucker, part of the only Badger team to be ranked #1 in the country |
The 2007 and 2014 teams were strikingly similar. This
year’s team is better offensively and the Alando Tucker and Brian Butch led team stouter
defensively. Even more amazing was both teams averaged 64.4 possessions a game.
However, 2014 has one distinct advantage of 2007, this year the Badgers enter
the tournament healthy (losing Brian Butch with a dislocated elbow against Ohio State in the Big Ten
Tournament was a killer for that NCAA tournament run).
In order to avoid the early tournament exit here are few keys for Wisconsin to advance out of the West Region.
How Wisconsin Wins the West
Get Sam Dekker back on track.
Dekker has been in a self-admitted mini slump the past few
weeks. After scoring 16 points against Indiana February 25 in a 69-58 win, Dekker was averaging 13.6
points a game. The next five games, including the Big Ten Tournament, Dekker
averaged 7.8 points and saw his season average dip down to 12.7 points a game.
More attacking from Dekker will mean a more dangerous offense. |
One of the best aspects of Sam’s game is his unselfishness.
While his willingness to involve teammates is admirable, especially when the Badgers have plenty of scorers, the NCAA tournament is a different matter.
Someone has to be willing to take over games. Frank Kaminsky
has shown he can be the go to scorer at times this season (25 and 21 points in road
wins against Michigan and Iowa). But Kaminksy also has a penchant for picking
up fouls (2 points, 20 minutes, 4 fouls at Illinois and 9 points, 15 minutes
and 2 quick first half fouls).
Lack of aggression has plagued Dekker on occasion throughout
the season. Against Ohio State Bo Ryan incredulously mocked Sam’s weak-hearted effort cutting the hoop. But when Sam is on the attack, driving to the hoop or grabbing
rebounds, the Badgers are better. In Badgers 26 wins, Dekker averages 13.5
points, 6.5 rebounds and 1.5 assists. In six losses his averages dropped to
10.3 points, 5.6 rebounds and less than one assist. Sam is one of the few Badger players that can generate shots off the dribble and when he is aggressive it creates more open shots for everyone.
In order for Wisconsin to advance out the West Region one
player will need establish themselves as the go to man. My money is on Slam
Dekker.
Freshman Contributions
Nigel Hayes and Bronson Koenig have emerged as key cogs to a Badger tournament run |
Nigel Hayes and Bronson Koenig were wildcards at the beginning of the season. With one senior playing regular minutes, how quickly the two freshman could adjust to big time college basketball would go a long way toward determining the team's success. Consider Hayes and Koenig as having passed that test.
Hayes really came on during Big Ten conference play, upping
his per game average by over three per game. He gives Wisconsin another mismatch with his
offensive versatility. He can take
bigger guys off the dribble with his quickness and patented post move Chocolate
Tornado. Conversely he can hit the mid-range jump shot with enough
consistency to keep defenders honest.
Koenig on the other hand has had more of an up and down
season playing behind three upper classmen in the back court. But after his 14
point outburst against Minnesota in the Big Ten Tournament quarterfinals, he demonstrated
his ability to provide more than just consistent ball handling and decision
making off the bench. If Koenig can continue to hit the outside shot, the
Badgers will have seven of eight rotation players as
legitimate three point threats.
If both Hayes and Koenig can continue their aggressive play
they will a great chance to showcase their skills on a national stage in the
tournament.
What Sends Wisconsin Home
No Defensive Stops
Without question Wisconsin has struggled on the defensive
end this season, sometimes for long stretches. During the January stretch
when the Badgers lost five out of six games in two weeks, they allowed
opponents to shoot 51.2% on field goal attempts including a blistering 48% from
behind the arc. No matter how potent the offense is compared to previous Badger
teams, you cannot win allowing teams to shoot nearly 50% from three point land.
Collectively the Badgers have a tendency to lapse into lackadaisical defense. Their miscommunication was on full display in the January 22 loss at Minnesota. Sam Dekker chases non-shooting threat Oto Osenieks out toward the three point line as he attempts to screen Ben Brust guarding Austin Hollins. Brust anticipates Dekker to switch and take Hollins as he drives to the hoop. But Dekker keeps trailing Osenieks(again – a career 23% three point shooter) and Brust turns Hollins loose. The result is painful.
It doesn't get much better either. The following is a list
of teams the Badgers could potentially face and their offensive efficiency from
KenPom. If Wisconsin advances to Dallas
in the Final Four they will have to beat some of the top offenses in the country.
Yikes.
KenPom Off. Eff.
|
Rank
|
Round Facing
|
|
American
|
103.2
|
200
|
First Round
|
BYU
|
113.7
|
27
|
Round of 32
|
Oregon
|
117
|
12
|
Round of 32
|
Creighton
|
125
|
1
|
Sweet Sixteen
|
Baylor
|
118.5
|
7
|
Sweet Sixteen
|
Arizona
|
113.1
|
35
|
Elite Eight
|
Oklahoma State
|
113.9
|
25
|
Elite Eight
|
Front Court Foul Trouble
Frank Kaminsky and Nigel Hayes must stay on the floor. |
The front court depth has been a concern all season.
Certainly the emergence of Nigel Hayes has provided some relief, but he still
has a tendency to pick up silly fouls. Frank Kaminsky has turned into a
reliable defensive anchor and protects the rim well. However, his penchant for
challenging shots almost always results in a stretch each game with him on bench infoul trouble.
Behind Hayes and Kaminsky the Badgers are dangerously thin
in post players. Sam Dekker and Duje Dukan are more comfortable playing on the
wing, freshman Vitto Brown and senior Evan Anderson are not quite ready for
long stretches playing big time basketball.
Additionally Hayes and Kaminsky are the most consistent
only post threats the Badgers have. Without those two on the floor, the Badgers
become way too reliable on outside jump shots. As noted above Wisconsin will have
to face some potent offenses to advance out of the region and in all likelihood
will have win one game in a shootout (not something Bo Ryan teams are accustomed
to).
Certainly the Badgers have enough capable shooters to get
hot and bomb three pointers a la Jon Bryant in 2000. But this year the Badgers
have been most potent when they work inside out. Without Kaminksy and Hayes getting the ball in the post, the Badgers have become too reliant on outside jumpers. Getting the defense to collapse with those two attacking inside allows the open outside shots to develop.
Unless Dekker is reinvigorated slashing and attacking the
rim, Hayes and Kaminsky are the best bets to keep the offensive from being one
dimensional. It is imperative to keep them out of foul trouble and out on the
floor.
The Verdict
Ben Brust and Sam Dekker have Wisconsin poised for its first Final Four since 2000 |
I still think this Badger team has shades of Michigan from last year. Both teams were undefeated in non-conference play and struggled somewhat in the rugged and physical Big Ten. Once Michigan entered the tournament, their offensive prowess was on full display and they were 20 minutes of a national title.
Wisconsin is built a lot like that team. Not nearly as
defensive oriented as Bo Ryan teams of yesteryear, the Badgers are versatile on
offense. They have a nice balance of scoring. 45% of the Badger's points come on two point shots, while 31% are on three point makes. The division one average is 51% and 27% respectively.
They have also won games in a variety of styles and pace. The Badgers have beaten teams scoring in the 100s, 90s, 80s, 70s, 60s, 50s and 40s, an incredible range that speaks to their flexibility. Tournament games are often about match-ups, and Wisconsin has shown the ability to match anything they face. A good sign for the randomness and unpredictability of March Madness.
Something tells me this will be the year Bo Ryan finally
gets to the Final Four. The team is talented, the bracket isn’t overwhelming
and eventually, a coach as good a Bo gets to the Final Four, right?
Until next time, Beers, Brats, and Championships.
- Neal Olson
Follow us on Twitter (@WISportsBlog) for up to date news on the Packers, Brewers, Badgers, Bucks, and Golden Eagles. We feature live in-game commentary, breaking news, rumors, previews, and post game discussion. Follow the entire writing team on Twitter: @AndrewVrchota, @jheldred, @JoeP_Norton, @olewr7, @Stevie2Westside, and @10iskristin
Until next time, Beers, Brats, and Championships.
- Neal Olson
Follow us on Twitter (@WISportsBlog) for up to date news on the Packers, Brewers, Badgers, Bucks, and Golden Eagles. We feature live in-game commentary, breaking news, rumors, previews, and post game discussion. Follow the entire writing team on Twitter: @AndrewVrchota, @jheldred, @JoeP_Norton, @olewr7, @Stevie2Westside, and @10iskristin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)